Comments on: How to Build Your First Cube https://www.quietspeculation.com/2011/08/how-to-build-your-first-cube/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:49:01 +0000 hourly 1 By: Robert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2011/08/how-to-build-your-first-cube/#comment-23062 Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:49:01 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=19212#comment-23062 In reply to ertaislament.

This is actually a really cool idea, though. I've begun building a few cubes before and given up because of the incredibly overwhelming number of options. This is a great way to just start somewhere. Nothing saying you can't start adding other blocks in one at a time later, either.

]]>
By: ertaislament https://www.quietspeculation.com/2011/08/how-to-build-your-first-cube/#comment-23014 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:03:01 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=19212#comment-23014 In reply to Robert.

That's a great point. Although doubling is statistically too much, we can revise the numbers to give a much more accurate representation. I'd done it this eway to keep it relatively simple, but having laid a foundation here there's no reason I can't revisit it and go a bit deeper in that direction. I'll make this part of the next article, thanks for the comment!

]]>
By: Robert https://www.quietspeculation.com/2011/08/how-to-build-your-first-cube/#comment-22999 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 02:54:33 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=19212#comment-22999 In most Standard formats, I'd totally agree with giving artifacts/nonbasic lands their own section that was the same size as the other.

In this Standard environment, I think that would be a grave mistake. The two blocks are built around…artifacts and lands. I think that you should, in this case, double that section if possible, cutting each of the other sections down slightly to compensate.

]]>