Comments on: Insider: Third Time’s the Charm https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/02/insider-third-times-the-charm/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Tue, 18 Jan 2022 02:46:09 +0000 hourly 1 By: JasonAlt https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/02/insider-third-times-the-charm/#comment-42909 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:19:00 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35947#comment-42909 In reply to Jacob Hilty.

I don\’t think anyone who has mentioned Biomancer and Zegana has done some without mentioning Thragtusk in the first 4 seconds. However, I don\’t think he\’s as bad alone as others do. Sure, he\’s bad if you never play another creature. But which decks do that?

]]> By: David Schumann https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/02/insider-third-times-the-charm/#comment-42878 Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:12:35 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35947#comment-42878 In reply to Jacob Hilty.

You should consider how bad he is on his own however….4 mana for a 2/4 with no ETB abilities. I understand how everyone wants this guy to be bonkers, and in Magical Christmasland he’s pretty solid…but as a mid game/late game top deck..he’s pretty awful.

]]> By: Jacob Hilty https://www.quietspeculation.com/2013/02/insider-third-times-the-charm/#comment-42874 Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:36:38 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=35947#comment-42874 Biomancer in multiples happened on the SCG open stream and sold me on his potential. The card seemed bonkers in that context. Also just going Biomancer > Thragtusk, seems like a pretty big beating.

]]>