Comments on: Constructed Resources Really Dropped the Ball https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:28:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: Reta Oya https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-186546 Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:28:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-186546 Outstanding post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!

]]> By: KP https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180860 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:47:35 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180860 If the podcast had been named any of those things, I would not have noticed it on iTunes. By calling it Constructed Resources, they building on the good recognition and reputation Marshall has built into the Limited Resources brand, and that’s a really good moves. Honestly, the only good name involving constructed has criticism and that was taken, so none of those names are worth giving up the name recognition.

]]> By: pi https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180665 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:03:10 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180665 In reply to Kasey.

Was just going to point that out, all names suggested in the article aren’t magic cards, to me that’d be enough to rule them out. I like “Standardize” if they would be focusing on Standard Constructed (I’m not familiar with either podcast).

]]> By: marten https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180287 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:10:02 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180287 I like standard procedures, and another cast could be modern developments

]]> By: Krond https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180265 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:13:48 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180265 The name might not be the coolest… But another podcast by Sutcliff and Loucks! Rejoice! I’ll have to add that to my list and give it a listen today. Unlimited resources, or the Sutcliff Louckes Power Hour would be sweet indeed, but having the name tie in to their other cast is understandable.

I just hope they don’t start with, “We are your Constructed Resources… (Canned laughter)”.

]]> By: Danny Brown https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180167 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:07:47 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180167 In reply to Kasey.

Excellent point. There are so many layers to the LR name, and CR is just not at the same level.

]]> By: Kasey https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180159 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:56:08 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180159 Limited resources is also a white enchantment from exodus

]]> By: Danny Brown https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180112 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:28:55 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180112 In reply to Steven.

Agreed on both counts!

]]> By: Steven https://www.quietspeculation.com/2014/09/constructed-resources-really-dropped-the-ball/#comment-180111 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:27:58 +0000 http://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=52117#comment-180111 Promising that the only criticism so far is that the name “could be better”. Hopefully the content is as good as LRCast.

]]>