Are you a Quiet Speculation member?
If not, now is a perfect time to join up! Our powerful tools, breaking-news analysis, and exclusive Discord channel will make sure you stay up to date and ahead of the curve.
Watching Grand Prix Vancouver coverage last weekend, one thing became decisively clear.
I believe Wizards put it best in their summary of the first nine rounds on Day 1:
The story of the [first] day was the resurgence of Splinter Twin after the momentum gain that was Pro Tour Fate Reforged. The two-card combo has broken out like a bad rash here, and some decks are even running cards like Vedalken Shackles maindeck to take down the mirror.
If youāre sitting on a bunch of Splinter Twins, Iād begin to sweat if I were you.
Suddenly Iām reminded of the old-school Snapple commercials. You know, the one with the Snapple bottle cheerleaders chanting for Cola and the announcer confessing they want to be number three. Oh, why donāt you just invest 31 seconds of time and watch it:
What does this have to do with MTG Finance? Everything.
I Want To Be #3!!!
Iād settle for number two, but I definitely donāt want to be speculating heavily on cards in the best Modern deck right now, no matter what it is.
I mean, itāll be a great ride sitting on the cards in the best Modern deck... for a couple months. But once a deck consistently outperforms, it leaps onto WOTCās radar ā thatās when you know potential bans are incoming.
And we all know what happens to banned cards:
Or even cards only played in the deck that was hosed by said banning:
The Orzhov Pontiff chart above is most telling, if you ask me. That card was on an exponential rise, being bought out everywhere as key maindeck and sideboard tech for and against Birthing Pod strategies.
After briefly touching $20, the card swiftly fell back down to $10. But it was the banning of Birthing Pod that buried the hatchet, sending this cardās value all the way down to its pre-spike price of around $6.
Clearly, and quite obviously, bannings can have a drastically negative impact on many card prices.
Just ask yet another recently hit card, Linvala, Keeper of Silence. She may be a very difficult to find Angel, but sheās no longer all that relevant in Modern. Now it really is just casual play or Angel collectors propping up her ludicrous price. Needless to say, thereās no upside here.
My Strategy Going Forward
In a way, Iāve created a paradox for myself. I donāt want to be sitting on many copies of any card if itās currently in a dominant Modern build. As a recent Melira Pod player in Modern, I know the pain of watching a deck drop in value overnight. Itās not a pretty picture and I wouldnāt wish it on anyone.
But if I avoid hot cards altogether, Iāll miss out on some of the greatest runs in Modern. Orzhov Pontiff made some people a ton of money before it tanked right back down again. And while they didnāt have a chance to bounce yet, I am confident there was a ton of upside in Voice of Resurgence and Chord of Calling. Not anymore.
We must resort to a balancing act ā we want to be invested in hot Modern cards as they rise, but we must not become complacent. If you decide to buy into Splinter Twin because the deck is suddenly dominant, you sign yourself up for closely monitoring the metagame. One too many GP wins, and you could be looking at a sizable loss.
I donāt care how hot the card is now ā selling into hype is still the play. Always.
Or if you discover you prefer Abzan cards for their recent popularity, be careful going ultra-deep on Siege Rhino. Itās a Standard card still, for one, but it also cannot be too powerful in Modern without getting overly scrutinized.
Iām not saying weāre there yet. Far from it. Iām just urging care when buying deep into any Modern card in a dominant deck.
Whatās the definition of ādominantā? Beats me. Wizards seems to have some arbitrary criteria they use. Birthing Pod was dominant. Deathrite Shaman was dominant. Treasure Cruise was dominant. I believe they aim to ban any card that warps the format so much that a large number of other fringe decks are not played because they just arenāt good enough.
Then again, how many Modern decks are actually āgood enoughā now? Three? Four? Certainly not enough. So the recent bannings didnāt really solve the problem, did it? It made for a lot of excitement at Pro Tour Fate Reforged only to witness a format get solved in three days.
Well, thatās what we get for demanding a Modern Pro Tour. Wizards did warn us about this, I suppose.
I say, letās bring on the Legacy Pro Tour. But thatās just me.
In any event, just be careful when buying deeply into the best Modern deck. And for those who enjoy battling at various tournaments, Iād strongly urge you to strive for number three. That is, picking up the third best deck in the current metagame.
It will be good enough to keep you competitive, while also dodging the WOTC banning radar. This is the perfect balance to ensure you can win some events while not getting blown out by a sudden banning.
Wrapping It Up
I want to be number three! What I really mean to say is, I donāt want to play the ābestā Modern deck right now. I did that with my Melira Pod deck and I got buried by the recent banning.
I suppose the writing was on the wall, and I canāt say I was truly surprised by the announcement. But thereās still that glimmer of hope inside that just maybe youāll be allowed to continue using your $500 investment for another three months.
Put this way, the chain of events sounds rather depressing, doesnāt it? I really pity the players who foiled out their Melira Pod build, only to watch it tank in value. I canāt think of other hobbies where such large investments can suddenly become unusable.
It would be like buying a new set of golf clubs, only to find out they didnāt follow the PGAās standards for golf club design and so they were banned. I canāt imagine the PGA does this all that often.
Wizards of the Coast has certainly developed a reputation for acting rashly when banning cards in Modern. They are doing their very best to keep the format healthy, but so far I would have to say success has eluded them.
And if the metagame continues to be Splinter Twin, Burn, Abzan, and Bloom Titan, I think additional changes will be inevitable. Just make sure youāre on the third best deck when that time comes.
Happy balancing!
ā¦
Sigbits
- SCG is sold out of nonfoil Splinter Twins at $21.29. If the deck puts up a strong showing in the GP Vancouver Top 8, expect this to be $30 very rapidly.
- I am finally building my first somewhat strategized Tiny Leaders deck. My leader of choice? Well, I wanted to play Blue/Black, so that left me with only one option. Sygg, River Cutthroat. I found my copy for $6 on eBay, but SCG is completely sold out at $5.45. If Tiny Leaders continues to gain momentum, this card will certainly hit $10, as Blue/Black is a fairly popular color combination in Magic. Just look at Underground Sea if you donāt believe me.
- Something doesnāt look right. Star City Games has no nonfoil Pact of Negations in stock. Thatās to be expected. What seems odd is their pricing: $24.99 for Future Sight copies but $13.99 for Modern Masters copies? Theyāre the same artwork, right? And the price discrepancy isnāt nearly this significant on TCG Player. I can understand the discrepancy on foils, but the nonfoil versions should be much closer in price. Something needs to be updated here.
with foil splinter twins at 39.99 on starcity vs its non-foil sold out px of 21.29, doesn’t the foil look like a steal at less than 2x multiple?? or are we still worried about the MM reprint or that its only printed at rare?
I’ve noticed many Modern foils haven’t earned that high multiplier. It’s really odd, isn’t it? I personally don’t like Modern foils – foiling out decks is a journey someone takes when they love their Legacy/Vintage deck so much and they want to play it for years and years. With the swirl in Modern these days, bannings and unbannings, there’s no motivation for such a commitment. Someone who would have bought foil Birthing Pods and Meliras lost a lot of money.
If Splinter Twin gets the ban hammer, then what happens to the value of foils? Not a risk I’d want to take, personally.
Thanks for your question!
“Wizards is sold out of nonfoil Splinter Twins at $21.29. If the deck puts up a strong showing in the GP Vancouver Top 8, expect this to be $30 very rapidly.”
SCG?
Yes. But did you really have to ask? š
I think there’s a bigger picture: Modern Masters II is fast approaching and anything with a sizable price tag is reprintable. The key indicator as to whether or not Splinter Twin has been on Wizards’ radar is whether or not it’s included in this set.
If it is – great reprint and the price goes down
If not – likely under consideration for banning and not a great investment target
Either way, there’s a sizable risk of price drop. I won’t be trading into any Splinter Twins, that’s for sure. It would be better to move into cards played heavily in the deck but also played in other decks as well. Noble Hierarch was a great example – it was huge in Pod decks, but fortunately it sees play elsewhere in Modern so the banning didn’t crush its value.
Although not a great spec target because of MM2015 I feel like you overlook Affinity in your short list of playable decks. Affinity will always be playable, especially when you can dodge the hate, but unlikely to be banned because it is so hate-able. All you need to do to learn the deck is watch some free Frank Kartsens videos on Channel Fireball. Every time the next big bad deck comes out and people take out a creeping corrosion or a stony silence to fit some other piece of tech in their deck, Affinity becomes that much more likely to win the tourney. Check the last month of SCG events for proof.
Ben,
I will most certainly concede that Affinity deserved mention in my article. This was an oversight on my part. That being said, Affinity is not really considered oppressive to the format…yet. I bet if Wizards were to ban Siege Rhino, Summer Bloom, and Lightning Bolt, Affinity and Boggles would dominate the format!
On the other hand, you’re also right that picking up Affinity cards seems very poor right now since we are fairly confident Metalcraft will be a “thing” in MMA 2015. So Affinity players won’t get burned by a banning, but they’ll get burned by reprints. Either way, I can’t advocate buying in…as attractive as Inkmoth Nexus can be…
Thanks for building on my article!
Sure thing Sig! Your articles are the best on the internet. Glad to add something relevant.
Thanks for the kind words. It really means a lot to me š
Pod is still potentially playable in Legacy all is not lost. See link. Plus creatures keep getting better.http://www.gatheringmagic.com/carlosgutierrez-constructed-02212015-5-decks-you-cant-miss-this-week/