Comments on: Examining the Banlist: Complaints, Clarifications & Suggestions https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Fri, 25 Nov 2016 23:49:52 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jason Schousboe https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127316 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 23:49:52 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127316 In reply to James DeMink.

From a practical standpoint, asking for a Top unban is a complete waste of time. The card is bad for Wizards’ goals, not just for the format, but for Magic in general. It ruins tournament experiences and does horrendous things to coverage. Wizards knows this (and has basically said as much), and if you’re familiar at all with their statements on banlist philosophy, you know Top is a hard lock to stay banned.

]]>
By: ComplexPants https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127315 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 22:20:01 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127315 I would actually like to see Vampire Hexmage be banned and Dark Depths be unbanned. It would allow for a combo deck to come into the meta. Blood moon is still a thing, GQ, tech edge and fulminator mage all exist to police lands. The deck can’t accelerate without exploration or manabond. I think it would be a way to keep linear/non-interactive decks in check.

]]>
By: Hagen Kirk https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127314 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:19:04 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127314 Ban SSG, Unban JTMS. I’d be more fine w/the idea of unbanning Jace if they are also committing to another reprint in MM17. W/the EMA reprint he is down to $60, but w/all the pent up desire to play him, feels like he would be as expensive as Goyf real fast. Banning SSG only makes sense if they have finally decided that fast mana w/no additional card cost is bad and they don’t want it in Modern. Both the red rituals and Mox Opal would also have to go. Cards like Infernal Plunge would be fine as they still require other resources to be expended to gain the value. Given the lack of results for SSG decks, it feels like you really can’t ban SSG w/o banning other stuff too.

As an Infect player, I wouldn’t really care much if BI was banned. Honestly, it would mean I could skip worrying about filling my yard w/fetches and I would run a set of Botanical Sanctum in the deck. Less fetches also makes Groundswell less good in the shell, so it’s possible the list would remain fetch heavy to bring that card back in. Might, Vines, Mutagenic, and Defense are likely enough pump spells tho, so maybe a couple of Serum Visions would find their way back into the list again. Preordain would certainly find its way in over Visions if it was unbanned.

What’s funny is that banning 8th wouldn’t get rid of Tron and Blood Moon, they would need to get rid of both 8th and 9th for that. Or just ban the cards that are issues and leave the rest alone. Choke, and Boil would be gone, but Boiling Seas and Flashfires would still be around.

A few other more fringe cards that would be lost to Modern (not a complete list):

Bribery
City of Brass
Dingus Egg
Merchant Scroll
Obliterate
Plow Under

]]>
By: Zach Stackhouse https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127313 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:49:56 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127313 In reply to James DeMink.

While it may sound as easy as extending rounds ten minutes, understand that you are talking about adding an entire hour per day to larger events. Those are already a grind as is.

]]>
By: ben coley https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127312 Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:15:12 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127312 In reply to James DeMink.

Ouch, no!

Every six rounds, adding another hour to a tournament? It would make larger tournaments ridiculous. It’s already nearly 10 or 11 at night quite often when a cut to top8 is made, and everyone is hungry and exhausted. The time constraints thing is a very real and legit reason to keep top banned.

It would be fine online because of the personal timer. I wonder if a future online format could allow it to be played. Who knows.

]]>
By: Mike Hawthorne https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127311 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:29:32 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127311 Great article!
#watermountains

]]>
By: James DeMink https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127310 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:15:29 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127310 it seems like top would be a more reasonable unban that jace would. countertop was soft banned out of extended due to time constraints and too many people going to time. yet it seems like we could diversify the format by unbaning it. the only thing we would have to do is make rounds 60 minutes instead of 50.

]]>
By: Leon du Plooy https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127309 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:26:10 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127309 Like the article must say I like what dredge has done for the format in making it more diverse. It is fun hitting dredge with rest in peace or having fuel for ooze haha and also who would have thought skred red ooo my word. I for 1 would not like to see any bans, want to see how the format evolves from here on.

]]>
By: Darcy Hartwick https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127308 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:14:18 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127308 Feel like the logic for ssg and opal should be the same. Either they dont belong because fast mana like that doesnt belong in modern, or they can both stay until they get oppressive. Opal is putting up far far better results than guide just by being played in affinity. So I dont see how you can say guide needs to go to neuter some tier 2 decks like ad naus and grishoalbrand but opal can stay despite being a tier one mainstay that forces everyone into stony silence nautres claim and ancient grudge whether they like it or not.

Id like to see them both go, but id also like to see either the consistency or speed of infect dredge and ds zoo reduced so more decks can keep up. We no longer have to always keep mana up like we did vs twin, but we still often have to have a specific answer on t2 or t3 or else lose the game anyways.

]]>
By: Pedro Pinhal https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127307 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:11:08 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127307 I Disagree on simian spirit guide ban, because it kills a deck a completely. a deck which i hate to play against but is not putting opressive results it is just a combo deck.

Yes two simian spirit guides can put a blood moon turn one, but you need to spend 4 cards of your inicial hand to do that and if the oponnent has basics in hand probably the game will not swing towards the 1st turn bood moon player it happened to me and i won over a blood moon on 1st turn only attacking with two creatures with 7 cards locked out on my hand except for those two creature.So i understand the problema but is as much problematic as when affinity drops the whole hand with four creatures and a plating on turn one or a etched champion turn one followed by plating to be equipped on turn two

chalice of the void trick is less significant since on turn two is still good and the decks that play that kind of trick already have good matchups against burn infect and death shadow which seems to be in my opinion, the matchups where the chalice is at his best.

If used past those turns with other cards is just a worst mana ramp with some advantages when it comes to pay for a spell Pierce or mana leak or pay is cost as creature which might indicate you are not winning the game.

Jace unban would be bad, decks would be constructed around having him safely enter on turn 3 4 or 5 (whatever would be the best shell for him) and after that is a crazy advantage on the long game

]]>
By: Bobby Frie https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127306 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:49:33 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127306 What a joy to read such a sensible banlist article amongst the sea of clickbaity, ban-mania articles. You clearly understand what makes modern the format it is, instead of demanding it gets dumbed down to the levels of standard, while losing what separated them. You also understand that we don’t ban things because “you don’t like them”. Heavy – handed bans are what got us to this place in modern, where fair decks are struggling and people cry for bans to fix their problems instead of answers that don’t tear the format apart.

That being said, i do disagree on a few things. First, Preordain can totally come off. It powers up the 3 most suppressed archetypes, combo, control and tempo. It helps them in the right way, consistency, not speed. It is only a slight upgrade, so it is extremely safe. If anything is actually a Preordain away from needing a ban, it was not long for this world anyway. Second, stoneforge mystic feels incredibly safe. Testing on this site showed it made almost no impact on any matchups, most importantly even jeskai could handle it, and they don’t even have access to k commamd, the cleanest answer to her in the format. Jtms may be safe now due to the formats speed, but if the format EVER slowed down he becomes a monster. Basically, for the same reasons you say BBE cant be unbanned, jtms cannot. Finally, saying ssg should be banned for doing nothing fair while putting up next to 0 results is silly considering earlier you said mox opal and dredge are fine, cards with much higher results that also do nothing fair. Being unfair is not ban criteria, and you do a great job avoiding this argument in the rest of the article.

All in all, despite a few disagreements on my end, well written. Even the few things i disagree on largely come down to opinion and i can see why you went the way you did (except ssg, he is fine, this is not opinion, it fills 0 ban criteria and the loose things you could ban it for can be applied to aboit half the format atm)

]]>
By: Thomas Elfgren https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127305 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:21:13 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127305 Changes to the banlist hasn’t been slowed. We had two unbans and one ban in the second BR update of the year. Usually there’s only the one in January to spice up the PT. If we have a January with no changes you could say that however.

]]>
By: Martin Ferdinand Møller https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127304 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:50:42 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127304 Awesome article Ryan. I agree on almost all of the cards and you gave a good explanation of your reasoning. I personally wouldnt mind seeing the ape get the axe aswell. It lets to some very degenerate draws like you mentioned.
The only thing I disagree with is Stoneforge.
You actually list all the reasons why Stoneforge isnt a problem but says it should remain on the banlist because its an auto include in white decks that want a good fair card. By this premise I could mention 10 cards that you should be banned. And just to mention creatures, goyf and snapcaster should get the axe aswell. As green and blue should be looking for reason not play them. Which is either synergy or the deck is a combo deck.
I dont get why white has to remain a sideboard color and especially now that the format is so aggressive sfm might just be what the doctor ordered for Jeskai or Esper to be viable again.

On a side note. You are awesome on coverage. Big fan.

]]>
By: ben coley https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127303 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:22:47 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127303 In reply to ben coley.

Oh and bloodbraid elf wasn’t banned for being too good. Go back and look at wizards’ official statement!

It was banned because they felt Jund was overperforming (deathrite was the cause) and they needed to axe a card that *only* Jund was playing, to minimise splash damage. They picked bloodbraid bot because of power bur because it was a card other decks weren’t using at the time.

And yes, it became abundantly clear in the following weeks/months that banning bloodbraid elf had no effect. The card was fine, and banning it didn’t solve anything. They had to ban deathrite shaman to finally achieve what they wanted for the deck. Bloodbraid should come back off the banlist 100%.

]]>
By: ben coley https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127302 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:18:40 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127302 Breach decks used SSG for a while, yes, but they’ve mostly stopped now. It ended up being a close-but-not-perfect fit.

The only deck playing SSG now (with any real frequency) is ad nauseam, which isn’t a problem deck and isn’t making anyone hate modern.

I’ve heard the rhetoric along the lines of “SSG does unfair things & should be banned” but as you very clearly stated with Mox Opal, if nobody’s actually using it, or doing unfair things with it, it’s fine and should remain legal.

I think you sort of backed yourself into a corner with this one, because the logic you applied to Mox Opal very much applies to simian spirit guide here (I.e. It could *potentially* be broken, but at the moment it isn’t, I mean when was the last time a guided-out blood moon was a serious dominant problem?), and your argument to ban SSG just comes over as a rant about the card’s future potential rather than what it’s actually doing.

For that reason, I think SSG is fine. “Don’t try to fix what isn’t broken” seems to spring to mind. Nobody ever called out for an ad nauseam ban, which is what an SSG ban would amount to.

]]>
By: Joshua Dostine https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127301 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 04:59:37 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127301 In reply to George Kourou.

The issue being is non control blue decks will run it also. Remeber when infect ran serum visions? Now imagine preordain in its place. Its actually really good. I used to run ponder in my infecr decks when it was standard legal.

]]>
By: Nicolas Dangelo Biancaccio https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127300 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:35:31 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127300 i cant disagree more about simian spirit guide, without the ape, you basicaly erase combo decks from modern, or at least, the only one capable of competition (ad nauseam). breach using SSG it’s a consequence of modern being too fast, but, again, this is not about SSG per se

About preordain, im confused too. Why decks like death’s shadow, infect, dredge, rg titan and a big etc can have consistency in form of raw power and blue decks cant have good card selection?

]]>
By: George Kourou https://www.quietspeculation.com/2016/11/examining-banlist-complaints-clarifications-suggestions/#comment-2127299 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:30:09 +0000 http://34.200.137.49/?p=12329#comment-2127299 Hey Ryan. For starters, good job on this article yet one more time.
I would like to speak a little bit about the only thing I disagree with:
By unbanning Preordain, you essentially power up the 3 decks that have the biggest “issues” at the competitive Modern scene at the moment, meaning Blue based Control decks, Spell based Combo decks and Tempo decks. By banning Simian Spirit Guide you nerf them at the same time. I would love if all of your choices were the case for Wizards, but Preordain would be fine I Feel. On top of that, it feels ,as you state as well, highly hypocritic to have Ancient Stirrings legal and Preordain banned. It’s literally 100% crazy. I would really be confused if they didnt unban this card, except if they were to ban Ancient Stirrings.
My view would be:
Unban Preordain
Ban Simian Spirit Guide and monitor the Dredge situation.
Greetings, George.

]]>