Comments on: Video Series with Ryland: Jace Moon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:16:16 +0000 hourly 1 By: Alexander Gnan https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129187 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:16:16 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129187 In reply to Mikefon.

jace is just better in every way. fills the same slot on the curve and is a win condition itself. chandra is a fine card, but its just outclassed on curve.

]]>
By: Mikefon https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129186 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:20:34 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129186 Why not adding Chandra, Torch of Defiance to the party? I’m a huge fan of her especially in current meta since it helps keeping at bay other PW. And contrary to Jace and Liliana, her +1 does slowly kill hopponents. Any thoughts?

]]>
By: Roland F. Rivera Santiago https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129185 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:20:59 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129185 In reply to Graeme Holliday.

I concur, the Thing seems more cute than good. I’d jam a couple more Moons, the 22nd land, and the 4th Cryptic over it.

]]>
By: Tommy Hoff Hansen https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129184 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:21:55 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129184 In reply to mgl89dk.

It’s probably a personal choice, some people tend to sort decks into decktypes by even the slightest change in the list, some sort decks into decktypes based on a key-core of few cards.
Sometimes people base decktypes on what they think has the most focus in the meta.

]]>
By: Jason Schousboe https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129183 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:07:58 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129183 In reply to mgl89dk.

Whenever we’re spotlighting new builds like this, whether in videos or Deck of the Weeks, we like to make it super clear what the deck is before you click on it. We will most likely still be calling this deck Blue Moon in metagame updates and the like.

]]>
By: Graeme Holliday https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129182 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:50:09 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129182 I feel like this list might be better off without Thing in the Ice and with more Moon. Jace alone allows the deck to win without needing to worry about devoting more slots to threats, which historically was one of the biggest problems with Blue Moon imo.

Also of note is that Disrupting Shoal can be hardcast in the lategame, which comes up pretty often in this deck compared to the tempo decks that Shoal has seen play in. You don’t mind overpaying for a counterspell at that point.

]]>
By: mgl89dk https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/02/video-series-with-ryland-jace-moon/#comment-2129181 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:31:26 +0000 http://quietspeculation.com/?p=17372#comment-2129181 The deck seems cool, but why does Blue Moon need a new name, just because of one new card?

]]>