Comments on: Hold ‘Em & Fold ‘Em #16 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/10/hold-em-fold-em-16/ Play More, Win More, Pay Less Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:20:55 +0000 hourly 1 By: Edward Eng https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/10/hold-em-fold-em-16/#comment-1976606 Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:20:55 +0000 https://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=90134#comment-1976606 In reply to David R.

You’re right. I wonder why something like Amulet Titan uses Adventurous Impulse over Oath of Nissa.

https://www.mtgstocks.com/decks/180926 http://www.starcitygames.com/decks/124695

]]> By: David R https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/10/hold-em-fold-em-16/#comment-1976591 Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:18:16 +0000 https://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=90134#comment-1976591 Adventurous Impulse is almost strictly worse than Oath of Nissa in eternal formats, and with how little Pauper play it sees, I don’t see it going up much in price.

]]> By: Edward Eng https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/10/hold-em-fold-em-16/#comment-1976254 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:30:53 +0000 https://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=90134#comment-1976254 In reply to q ed2.

Ya. 🙁

I didn’t want to deal with multiple buylist channels and packages/costs. This is probably something I’ll revisit and talk about in a future article regarding issues like utilizing Quiet Speculation’s Trader Tools to find the highest buylist prices and dealing with buylisting/selling through multiple channels instead of using one all in one shot.

]]> By: q ed2 https://www.quietspeculation.com/2018/10/hold-em-fold-em-16/#comment-1976246 Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:58:18 +0000 https://www.quietspeculation.com/?p=90134#comment-1976246 $0.26 rattlechains, huh

]]>